Contribution of the NEPSY-II Battery Theory of Mind subtest as a measure of central coherence

Authors

  • Nerea Crespo-Eguílaz
  • Leyre Gambra Echeverría

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35869/reined.v18i3.3267

Keywords:

Central Coherence, Theory of Mind, Procedural Learning Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this research is to analyze the clinical utility of the “Theory of Mind” (TM) subtest of NEPSY-II (Korkman et al., 2014).

Methodology

TM was applied to 244 school aged children with normal intelligence: a control group (n=194) and clinical groups (n=50): ASD-grade 1 (n= 10); procedural learning disorder (PLD, n=24); and ADHD (n=16).

Results and Discussion

We do a examination of the factorial structure through a exploratory (KMO=0.62 and MSA=0,54-0,75) and confirmatory (? =22,75 p=0,504; TLI=1,04; CFI=1; RMSEA=0) analyses. The 21 items of the TM. 3 factors are obtained that explain 62% of the total variance: Theory of mind (items 1/2/7); Social stories comprehension (items 5/8/10/14) and Contextual coherence (items 9/12 / 16-21). The descriptive statistics are provided from the calculation of validity and reliability.

None of the groups differ in the first two factors (U-mann-Whitney). In Contextual coherence, the PLD group and the control groups (p=,001) differed significantly of the ASD group (p=,025).

The difficulties in understanding information in a quick and simultaneous way and integrating it coherently have been shown to be part of the neuropsychological profile of the PLD.

Conclusión

Our study provide a new correction an interpretation of the TM that evalautes Central coherence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles